What is required before a liability claim can be proved in court?

To establish a liability claim in court, it's essential to provide a preponderance of evidence. This legal standard means that the evidence presented must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is liable for the harm in question. In civil cases, this is the threshold that plaintiffs must meet to succeed in their claims. The preponderance of evidence reflects the idea that, even if the evidence is not overwhelming, it shifts the balance in favor of the plaintiff's assertions sufficiently to warrant a legal judgment in their favor.

In contrast, a consensus from all parties is not required to pursue a claim in court, as disputes often arise when parties do not agree. A reasonable settlement offer can occur before trial, but it does not constitute proof of liability in court—it is merely an attempt to resolve the dispute. Similarly, a written agreement between parties might clarify some aspects of a situation, but it isn't necessary for proving liability; rather, it may serve as evidence in the case. Thus, the preponderance of evidence is the critical criterion for proving liability in judicial proceedings.